Clinical Study of Urinary Kallidinogenase in the Treatment of Progressive Cerebral Infarction

  • Binghui Fan
  • Weidong Li
Keywords: Urinary kallidinogenase, Cerebral infarction, NIHSS

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Urinary kallidinogenase in the treatment of progressive cerebral infarction. Method: 104 cases of patients with acute cerebral infarction were randomly divided into treatment group and control group; where control group (52 cases) patients on with only basic medicine, while treatment group (52 cases), besides the basic medicine, patients will on urinary kallidinogenase 0.15 PNAU + 0.9% normal saline 100 mL intravenous injection, 1 times per day, and continuous for 14 days. The degree of neurological impairment (NIHSS) was assessed before and after treatment, and the changes of blood pressure were monitored. The liver, renal function, fibrinogen, platelet, and the adverse reactions were recorded and followed up in three month. Results: After treatment, NIHSS scores of the both groups were decreased (p < 0.05), however, total effective rate for treatment group were better than control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Urinary kallidinogenase is safe and effective in the treatment of progressive cerebral infarction.

References

1. Wang WZ. Neurology. Beijing: People’s medical publishing. 2004:135.
2. Zhong Y. Clinical neurological impairment score. Chinese Journal of Neurology. 1996;29(6):381.
3. Deng BM, Liu Y, et al. Urinary Kallidinogenase in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction clinical observation. Journal of Brain and Nervous Diseases. 2009;17(2):104‒105.
4. Wen DS, Wu ZW, et al. Urinary kallidinogenase treatment acute progressive cerebral infarction curative effect observation. Chinese Journal of Stroke. 2011;17(2):113‒114.
5. Cao J. Kinin in stroke cardiovascular and renal disease. Exp Hysiol. 2005;90:291‒298.
6. Wang L, Zhang Y. The clinical effect of acute cerebral infarction treated by Urinary Kallidinigenase. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases. 2011;36(10):627‒629.
Published
2013-12-18
Section
Original Research Article