A Comparative Study of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing and Right Ventricular Septal Pacing
Abstract
Objective: Assessment of cardiac function by the assessment of ventricular pacing and right ventricular apex pacing. Method: Analysis of 30 patients with VVI pacemaker (pacing RVA, right ventricular apical pacing RVS 15 cases) was analyzed, and the differences of cardiac function and pacing parameters were analyzed in one year. Results: There was no significant difference in the impedance, voltage threshold and R wave height between the 1 year after the effective pacing and the years after the pacing electrode. 1 year after the two groups of patients with significant differences in EF. Conclusion: Right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing are equally safe and effective, right ventricular apical pacing can lead to left ventricular systolic dysfunction and decreased left ventricular function.
References
2. Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing. Europace. 2003;5(3):275‒278.
3. Drazner MH, Thompson B, Rosenberg PB, et al. Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(8):993‒995.
4. Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA, et al. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(3):252‒256
5. Miyoshi F, Kobayashi Y, Itou H, et al. Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing. PACE. 2005;28(11):1182‒1186.
6. Rosenqvist M, Lsaaz K, Botvinick EH, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to a atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67(2):148‒156.
Copyright (c) 2015 Shimao Ni, Changhao Jiang, Zhili Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting to USP journals agree to publish their manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) where authors agree to allow third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights (online and print) granted to Universe Scientific Publishing or the owner of the journal in question.