The Comparative Study of Open and Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy in 64 Cases of Patients
Abstract
Objective: A comparative study between two methods of open and laparoscopic partial hepatectomy. Method: 64 cases of patients with partial hepatectomy were choosing from our hospital from January 2014 to December 2014. Two groups were assigned according to the principle of random allocation of the open group and laparoscopic group, respectively and were observed its operation index, post-operative recovery indicators and other indicators. Results: Abdominal incision length, intra-operative bleeding volume, post-operative advanced liquid time, and hospitalization time were significantly better in Laparoscopic than laparotomy group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time and complications between the open and laparoscopic group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy is obviously superior to open liver resection where it is worth promoting in clinical practice.References
2. Jian Z, Zheng J, Wang G, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic hepatectomy. Practical Medical Journal. 2010;26(10):671‒673.
3. Zhan Q, Liang S, Cai J. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration of stone and open surgery. Journal of Practical Diagnostics. 2013;18(04):139‒141.
Copyright (c) 2015 Yaoping Yu, Zhengbin Huang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting to USP journals agree to publish their manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) where authors agree to allow third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights (online and print) granted to Universe Scientific Publishing or the owner of the journal in question.