Influence of Section Orientation of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography on the Measurement of TI-RADS Category 4 Thyroid Nodules Stiffness

  • Xinru Zhang The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
  • Zhe Ma The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
  • Shuaiya Xv The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
  • Chenxi Ba The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
Keywords: Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography, Cross-Sectional Orientation, Thyroid Nodules, Modal Values

Abstract

Thyroid shear wave elastography (SWE) is widely used as a noninvasive screening tool for thyroid nodules (TN) diagnosis. Herein, we assessed the effect of SWE section orientation on the stiffness measurement of TI-RADS category 4 TN. In this retrospective study, we followed up patients who had 2D ultrasound and elastography of the thyroid with pathological findings at our institution. The reliability and agreement between the aforementioned evaluations were further examined via calculation of the mean and maximum modulus values of the TN in both section orientations. As a result, there was good agreement in the measurement of the shear wave modulus of TN between the two different views, which provides relative flexibility for patients with anatomical or physiological defects.

References

[1] Swan, K. Z., V. E. Nielsen, and S. J. Bonnema. 2021. “Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules by Shear Wave Elastography: A Review of Current Knowledge.” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 44(10):2043–56.

[2] Wang JM, Wei WB, and Guo R. 2019. “Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Micro-Nodules.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 35(6).

[3] Shiina, Tsuyoshi, Kathryn R. Nightingale, Mark L. Palmeri, Timothy J. Hall, Jeffrey C. Bamber, et al. 2015. “WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 1: Basic Principles and Terminology.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 41(5): 1126–47.

[4] Cosgrove, David, Richard Barr, Joerg Bojunga, Vito Cantisani, Maria Cristina Chammas, et al. 2017. “WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 4. Thyroid.” Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 43(1):4–26.

[5] Chen, Y., Dong B, Jiang Z, Cai Q, Huang L, and Huang H. 2022. “SuperSonic Shear Imaging for the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 45(7):1327–39.

[6] Filho, Raimundo Holanda Carneiro, Fernando Linhares Pereira, and Wagner Iared. 2020. “Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of Two‐Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography in the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis.” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 39(9):1729–41.

[7] Zhou JQ, Yin LX, Wei X, Zhang S, Song YY, et al. 2020. “2020 Chinese Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: The C-TIRADS.” Endocrine 70(2):256–79.

[8] Zhao CK, and Xu HX. 2019. “Ultrasound Elastography of the Thyroid: Principles and Current Status.” Ultrasonography 38(2):106–24.

[9] Lee HY, Jeong Hyun Lee, Ji Hoon Shin, So Yeon Kim, Hee Jung Shin, et al. 2017. “Shear Wave Elastography Using Ultrasound: Effects of Anisotropy and Stretch Stress on a Tissue Phantom and in Vivo Reactive Lymph Nodes in the Neck.” Ultrasonography 36(1):25–32.

[10] Taljanovic, Mihra S., Lana H. Gimber, Giles W. Becker, L. Daniel Latt, Andrea S. Klauser,et al. 2017. “Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications.” RadioGraphics 37(3):855–70.

[11] Kim, Hana, Jeong-Ah Kim, Eun Ju Son, and Ji Hyun Youk. 2013. “Quantitative Assessment of Shear-Wave Ultrasound Elastography in Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance for Predicting Malignancy.” European Radiology 23(9):2532–37.
Published
2023-03-02
Section
Original Research Article