Effects of Ultra-early Intervention on Gross Motor Function in Neonates with Hypoglycemic Brain Injury

  • Xiaoqing Wang The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University
  • Houhong Qin The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University,
  • Xiao Xia The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University
  • Xiaoding Wang The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University
  • Xiaoding Wang The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University
Keywords: Ultra-Early Intervention, Hypoglycemic Brain Injury, Gross Motor Function

Abstract

Objective : To investigate the effect of ultra-early intervention on gross motor function of neonates with hypoglycemic brain injury and evaluate the application value. Methods: we choose thirty four children with hypoglycemic brain injury who hospitalized in the neonatology department of Tai'an City central hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. They were randomly divided into conventional treatment group and ultra-early intervention group, each with 17 people. The conventional treatment group received conventional treatment. In addition to conventional treatment, the ultra-early intervention group was given ultra-early intervention . When two groups of children's corrected gestational age at 40 weeks, 42 weeks and 44 weeks, they need to be tested for NBNA neonatal neurobehavioral testing, Alberta Infant Exercise Scale (AIMS) assessment and general exercise quality assessment (GMs ). Results: When the child's corrected gestational age is 40 weeks, there is no significant difference in the scores of NBNA and AIMS between the ultra-early intervention group and the conventional treatment group; When the child's corrected gestational age is 42 weeks, the NBNA and AIMS scores of the ultra-early intervention group are higher than those of the conventional treatment group, but there is no statistical significance; When the child's corrected gestational age is 44 weeks, the ultra-early intervention group had higher NBNA and AIMS scores than the conventional treatment group, which was statistically  significant (P<0. 05). Conclusion: After ultra-early intervention, the development level of gross motor in the ultra-early intervention group was significantly higher than that in the conventional treatment group. Ultra early intervention has obvious effect on the improvement of gross motor function in neonates with hypoglycemic brain injury.

References

[1] Shao XM, Ye HM, Qiu XS. Practical neonatology [M]. Version 4. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2011.

[2] Bao XL, the best life beginning for children aged 0-3 [M]. Beijing: China Development Press, 2006,29-49.

[3] Zhang YW, Guo J. Research progress of theoretical basis and intervention strategies for early intervention in high-risk children [J]. China Rehabilitation, 2019,34 (2): 101-104.

[4] Zhang Q, Early physical therapy for high-risk children with cerebral palsy [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2014,20 (11): 1035-1040.

[5] Campos D, Santos DC, Goncalves VM, et al. Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months[J]. Jpediatr ,2006,82(6):470—474.

[6] Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MJ. et al. Assessment of gross motorskills of atriskinfants: predictive validity of the Alberta InfantMotor Scale[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol ,1998,40(7):485—491.

[7] Herskind A, Greisen G, Nielsen JB. et al. Early identification and interventionin cerebral palsy [J]. Dev Med ChildNeurol ,2015,57(1) :29-36.

[8] de Vries LS, Benders MJ, Groenendaal F. et al . Progress in neonatal neurology with a focus on neuroimaging in the preterm infant [J]. Neuropediatrics, 2015, 46( 4): 234-241.

[9] Liu WM, Bao XL, Ma L, et al. Clinical study of early intervention to reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy in very low birth weight infants [J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2015,23 (4): 360-363.

[10] Madan, LN, Wang Q, Study on the efficacy analysis of sensory integration training in early intervention in high-risk preterm infants [J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018,21 (32): 4028-4031.

[11] Zhang YN, Chen W, Gong ZJ, The influence of sensory integration training on the development of gross motor function in high-risk children [J]. Chinese Rehabilitation Journal, 2017,32 (5): 355-357.

[12] Bian QY, Yu XX, Yin SJ, The effect of early sensory integration training in high-risk infants [J]. Chinese Journal of Maternal and Child Health Research, 2015,26 (04): 719-720 + 723.

[13] Li Q, Zhang XH, Song YL, The systematic evaluation of pediatric massage intervention in the neuropsychological development of preterm infants [J]. Shaanxi Traditional Chinese Medicine Journal, 2019,40:07: 972-975 + 984.
Published
2022-11-03
Section
Original Research Article