Pioglitazone - Current status in the management of type 2 diabetes patients in India

  • Hiren Prajapati Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited, Gujarat
Keywords: Diabetes, pioglitazone, insulin resistance, bladder cancer, HbA1c

Abstract

Diabetes is a major public health issue worldwide which is approaching epidemic proportions globally, including India. Among the proven pathophysiological factors for the development of type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance is the most common among Indian type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone is currently most commonly prescribed either alone or in combination with other oral anti -hyperglycemic agents that target insulin resistance and improve insulin sensitivity among type 2 diabetes. The biggest controversy with pioglitazone for bladder cancer is over now. The major correlation between pioglitazone and bladder cancer is the duration of therapy > 24 months and cumulative dose of > 28000 mg which means the average daily dose of pioglitazone is about 40 mg/day. Dose dependent cumulative cancer by pioglitazone is also not possible in Indian patients because of low dose, i.e., 30 mg/day as a single dose is used unlike other countries 40 mg/day. To balance the pros and cons of pioglitazone use in Indian type 2 diabetes, the most suitable dose should be < 15 mg/day to gain significant glycemic control as determined by HbA1c along with better safety profile compared to higher dose prescription practice in Western countries. Current Indian data have been analyzed in this review article and it has been revealed that pioglitazone in lower dose of 7.5 mg/day offers similar HbA1c reduction property as moderate dose of 30 mg/day pioglitazone with lesser incidence of side effects. Therefore, to continue the benefits of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes, prescription of low dose of pioglitazone is emerging trend in India.

References

[1]. International diabetes federation (idf) diabetes atlas, Eighth Edition 2017 https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas.html Accessed on 20th December, 2017.
[2]. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC, 2016).
https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/diabetes.htm Accessed on 5th January, 2017.
[3]. Scheen AJ. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Acta Clin Belg 2003; Nov-Dec; 58(6): 335-41.
[4]. Scheen AJ, Lefèbvre PJ. Pathophysiology of type 2 Diabetes. In: Kuhlmann J, puls W, eds. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Oral Antidiabetics. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1996: 7-42.
[5]. DeFronzo RA. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes : Metabolic and molecular implications for identifying diabetes genes. Diabetes Rev 1997; 5: 177-269.
[6]. Kahn SE. The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2003; 46: 3-19.
[7]. Scheen AJ. Obesity and diabetes. In : The Management of Obesity and Related Disorders (Kopelman P.G., Ed.), Martin Dunitz Ltd, London, UK 2001: 11-44.
[8]. Sims EA, Danforth E Jr. Expenditure and storage of energy in man. J Clin Invest 1987; 79: 1019–1025.
[9]. Reaven, G.M. 1995. Pathophysiology of insulin resistance in human disease. Physiol. Rev. 75: 473–486.
[10]. Shamna M, Karthikeyan M. Prescription pattern of antidiabetic drugs in the outpatient departments of hospitals in malappuram district, kerala. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2011 Sep 22; 22(4): 141-3.
[11]. Agarwal AA, Jadhav PR, Deshmukh YA. Prescribing pattern and efficacy of anti-diabetic drugs in maintaining optimal glycemic levels in diabetic patients. J Basic Clin Pharm 2014 Jun;5(3): 79-83.
[12]. Satpathy SV, Datta S, Upreti B. Utilization study of antidiabetic agents in a teaching hospital of sikkim and adherence to current standard treatment guidelines. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2016 Jul-Sep; 8(3): 223-8.
[13]. Actos label. Package Insert: 2017 Dec 21.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/021073s049lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
[14]. Actos lable. Package insert: 2016 July 06.
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000285/WC500021386.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
[15]. Charbonnel B, Roden M, Urquhart R, et al. Pioglitazone elicits long-term improvements in insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with gliclazide-based regimens. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 553–60.
[16]. Staels B. Metformin and pioglitazone: Effectively treating insulin resistance. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: S27–37.
[17]. Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Jones ML, et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1792–823.
[18]. http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/Minutes%20of%2064th%20DTAB%20meeting.pdf Accessed on 11 Jan 2018.
[19]. Vijay P. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer: The pros and cons. JAPI. 2012; 6072-6073.
[20]. Einhorn D, Fonseca V. Revisiting the use of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2016 Nov; 22(11): 1343-1346.
[21]. Pai SA, Kshirsagar NA. Pioglitazone utilization, Efficacy & safety in indian type 2 diabetic patients: A systematic review & comparison with european medicines agency assessment report. Indian J Med Res 2016 Nov; 144(5): 672-681.
[22]. Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the american association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract 2017 Feb; 23(2): 207-238.
[23]. Panikar V, Kale NJ, Hoskote SS, et al. Effect of low (7.5 mg/day), standard (15 mg/day) and high (30 mg/day) dose pioglitazone therapy on glycemic control and weight gain in recently-diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. J Assoc Physicians India 2015 Nov; 63(11): 36-9.
[24]. Majima T, Komatsu Y, Doi K, et al. Safety and efficacy of low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/ day) vs. standard-dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) in japanese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr J 2006; 53: 325- 330.
[25]. Adachi H, Katsuyama H, Yanai H. The low dose (7.5mg/ day) pioglitazone is beneficial to the improvement in metabolic parameters without weight gain and an increase of risk for heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2017; 227: 247-248.
[26]. S. Rajagopalan, P. Dutta, D. Hota, et al. Effect of low dose pioglitazone on glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double blind, clinical trial, diabetes res. Clin. Pract. 109 (2015) e32–e35.
[27]. Vu A, Kosmiski LA, Beitelshees AL, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of low-dose pioglitazone in patients with the metabolic syndrome without diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy 2016 Mar; 36(3): 252-62
[28]. Aso Y, Hara K, Ozeki N, et al. Low-dose pioglitazone increases serum high molecular weight adiponectin and improves glycemic control in japanese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009; 85(2): 147-152.
[29]. S. Rajagopalan, P. Dutta, D. Hota, et al. Effect of low dose pioglitazone on glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double blind, clinical trial, diabetes res. Clin. Pract. 109 (2015) e32–e35.
[30]. Aoki Y. Effects of low-dose pioglitazone on serum levels of adiponectin, dehydroepiandrosterone, amyloid beta peptide, and lipid profile in elderly japanese people with type 2 diabetes. Advances in Endocrinology 2015; Volume 2015, Article ID 782530, 6 pages.
Published
2018-04-19
Section
Original Research Article