Clinical effect of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Yanzhou Jiang
  • Liancong Fu
  • Yunshan Mu
Keywords: anterior and posterior surgery combined therapy, spinal cord type of cervical spondylosis, clinical efficacy, spinal nerve function

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for patients with spinal type. Methods: Randomly selected from January 2013 to December 2015 in our hospital 96 cases of cervical spondylosis patients treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 , the technical way of the operation of these 96 cases of loyalty if they were randomly divided into A, B, C three groups. A group of 32 cases were treated by combined anterior and posterior approach in treatment of cervical myelopathy. B group of 32 cases patients with anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and bone graft fusion internal fixation surgery to treat cervical vertebra disease, C treatment group of 32 patients used conventional posterior decompression and fusion surgery for lateral mass screw fixation. Postoperative follow-up, the three groups of X-ray intervertebral stability and fusion, neurological function JOA score and clinical efficacy of the effective date were compared. Results: three group of patients after half a year, the JOA scores were improved, the patients of the A group after a year of score(16.3±1.83),the scores of B and C two groups were respectively (15.7±1.15)ã€ï¼ˆ15.59±1.21), there was statistically differences between the three groups ( P < 0.05). After one year’s follow-up, the bone graft and internal fixation material had no loosening, displacement and subsidence, the fusion rate of A group reached 90.6%, the fusion rate of B group was 53.1%, the fusion rate of C group was 56.25%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). For clinical effectiveness is divided into apparent, effective, fair, invalid. the effective rate of group A was 87.5%, and the effective rate was 50% in group B, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: the treatment effect of A group was better than that of B and C two groups before and after operation, and the effect was significant.

References

1. Zhang Yilong, Zhou Feifei, Sun Yu. Changes of JOA scores in the near and midterm after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis myelopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of spinal cord, 2015, 25(1): 13-17.
2. Cui Mingyu. Comparative study on the therapeutic effects of different surgical approaches for cervical spondylosis myelopathy[J]. China Medical Herald, 2012, 09(1): 32-34.
3. Yang Bo, Fan Li, Huang Jing. Anterior and posterior combined surgery for the treatment of anterior and posterior spinal cord compression[J]. Armed police medicine, 2012, 23, (2):105-107.
Published
2018-03-19
Section
Original Research Article